[Spambayes] Other pop3proxy options
Terrel Shumway
tshumway at jdiworks.net
Thu Feb 20 13:52:42 EST 2003
On Wednesday 19 February 2003 16:08, Tim Stone - Four Stones Expressions
wrote:
> We're getting very close to requiring a full blown mail client, not just a
> proxy. Perhaps the solution to many problems is to provide a spambayes
> mailer, with training, retraining, etc. etc. all built in, and provide the
> proxy with necessarily limited function for those who don't wish to use the
> spambayes mailer. This thought is daunting, but it really is the easiest
> from a useability standpoint. - TimS
I have not read this thread very closely yet, but I thought I would chime in.
I am working on a complete mail server suite written in python. The pop3
server is working with a maildir backing store. The pop3 client "works" for
now, using poplib.py, but I will soon have an async version that supports
pipelining etc. The smtp currently listener works for basic delivery, but
some fancy configuration stuff still needs to be worked out. It is all
designed to be runnable as a single process with async listeners and
http-based configuration -- click and run.
Now I ask: could this help solve the problems you are discussing? It could be
used to make a smarter proxy that uses an intermediate store rather than an
online connection to an upstream server.
(Now I will go back and catch up on the discussion)
-- Terrel
More information about the Spambayes
mailing list