[Spambayes] Graph results
jm at jmason.org
Sat Mar 1 13:45:52 EST 2003
Alexander -- nice work! Thanks for investigating this...
> 2. Spambayes continues to improve for a couple months,
> but I'm starting to see an increase in errors after
> about 4-5 months. I don't know why this is; it might
> be because spam is mutating, or it might be because
> my definition of spam has been mutating.
Spam has definitely been mutating heavily in the last 4 months.
> Anyway, the next thing for me to really look at is the effect
> of aging...
As in expiration of tokens? I thought SB didn't use that?
Or do you mean validity of trained results from >3 months ago...
More information about the Spambayes