[Spambayes] Bytes/words ratio

[T. Alexander Popiel]

Skip's bytes/words metatoken seems to be a bust.

-> <stat> tested 2052 hams & 3838 spams against 8206 hams & 15350 spams
-> <stat> tested 2052 hams & 3838 spams against 8206 hams & 15350 spams
-> <stat> tested 2052 hams & 3838 spams against 8206 hams & 15350 spams
-> <stat> tested 2051 hams & 3837 spams against 8207 hams & 15351 spams
-> <stat> tested 2051 hams & 3837 spams against 8207 hams & 15351 spams
-> <stat> tested 2052 hams & 3838 spams against 8206 hams & 15350 spams
-> <stat> tested 2052 hams & 3838 spams against 8206 hams & 15350 spams
-> <stat> tested 2052 hams & 3838 spams against 8206 hams & 15350 spams
-> <stat> tested 2051 hams & 3837 spams against 8207 hams & 15351 spams
-> <stat> tested 2051 hams & 3837 spams against 8207 hams & 15351 spams
filename:  baseline.out       
                   skiptok.out
ham:spam:  10258:19188    
                   10258:19188
fp total:       16      16
fp %:         0.16    0.16
fn total:       52      52
fn %:         0.27    0.27
unsure t:      296     303
unsure %:     1.01    1.03
real cost: $271.20 $272.60
best cost: $252.40 $254.80
h mean:       0.40    0.39
h sdev:       5.35    5.31
s mean:      99.21   99.19
s sdev:       6.79    6.85
mean diff:   98.81   98.80
k:            8.14    8.12

Not much to say; all it did was make a few more things unsure by
spreading out the spam a bit more.  Blah.

- Alex