[Spambayes] Still getting horrible results from SpamBayes -
Anyadvice?
Peter Beckman
beckman at purplecow.com
Sun Sep 14 19:29:02 EDT 2003
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, Adam Lasnik wrote:
> From: Peter Beckman [mailto:beckman at purplecow.com]
>
> > I noticed that the email didn't even have a X-SpamBayes-Probability:
> > header (or whatever it is). Maybe that's the problem; some of your
> > mail isn't getting tagged.
> >
> > Check it in the headers.
>
> I just sent myself a test message. It showed up as a 4% spam
> probability in the SPAM Outlook field, but when looking at headers
> (reproduced below), there is no mention of Spam or SpamBayes. Is that a
> problem?
Hmmm. Tony, anyone? I know that every piece of mail that is either
trained or processed by SpamBayes has a header added to it. If your mail
DOES NOT have a header to it, it would lead me to believe that there is
either a configuration problem or it is working correctly and it just works
differently using the Outlook plugin.
Comments?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Beckman Internet Guy
beckman at purplecow.com http://www.purplecow.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Spambayes
mailing list