[Spambayes] Re: Training empty messages problem
Tony Meyer
tameyer at ihug.co.nz
Mon Dec 6 01:59:56 CET 2004
> Would it make sense to have a further fallback on a default
> token if nothing is found in any of the known properties,
> "from: exchange-unknown" or similar? That would seem to cover all
> bases.
There is a "X-Exchange-Message: true" header that gets added no matter
whether any Exchange headers are found or not. One could add this header to
the [Tokenizer] safe_headers option, which would mean that a token would be
generated if it was present. This would just involve adding a couple of
lines to the default_bayes_customize.ini file. I suppose we could modify
the default one that gets installed to do this.
Generally, (at least in my experience), messages that are Exchange-only are
very homogeneous in content, so easily classified without any faked-up
headers. It might help in the situation where there are empty messages,
though, I guess.
> Which properties are available may depend on how the local
> admins set up the address book
[...]
That makes sense.
=Tony.Meyer
--
Please always include the list (spambayes at python.org) in your replies
(reply-all), and please don't send me personal mail about SpamBayes.
http://www.massey.ac.nz/~tameyer/writing/reply_all.html explains this.
More information about the Spambayes
mailing list