[Spambayes] Why Improve Bayesian
cej at intech.com
Mon Feb 9 03:12:07 EST 2004
Tim Stone wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 16:34:20 -0800 (PST), dont bother
> <dontbotherworld at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Hey heres is quick question for you guys,
>> I always wonder whats the need for inventing new
>> techniques when most of the bayesian filters are
>> giving accuracy >99.7%?
>> Is that in time these bayesian techniques or method
>> will become less effective?
> I hope the drivers that pass me on the road going the opposite
> direction are a LOT better than 99.7% accurate... if you think about
> it, 99.7% ain't all that good...
Har har. Fortunately, the driver pool isn't made of random data (!).
Although, sometimes I'm not sure, driving around Providence, RI.
More information about the Spambayes