[Spambayes] Outlook plug-in vs. other methods
Amir_Katz at bmc.com
Wed Feb 18 02:35:03 EST 2004
I use Outlook with Exchange, so the answer is very clear. Thanks for the
detailed explanation. And the plug-in is excellent, I just wanted to make
sure that I'm not missing anything.
From: Tony Meyer [mailto:tameyer at ihug.co.nz]
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 01:03
To: 'Katz, Amir'; 'Spambayes mailing list (E-mail)'
Subject: RE: [Spambayes] Outlook plug-in vs. other methods
> If I use Outlook 2000 and wish to use SpamBayes,
> is the plug-in my only option or is there another way?
If you get your mail from POP3, you can use sb_server instead. If you get
your mail from IMAP4, you can use sb_imapfilter instead (this involves
running from source). If you use Exchange, you have no option; if you use
Hotmail, then you'd have to get the Hotmail mail via some sort of POP/IMAP
> If yes, what are the pros and cons of each?
Most importantly, you should get the same filtering results with any of the
The plug-in is an integrated solution. In almost all cases you'd want to
use this rather than the less integrated solutions. You get training via
drag-and-drop, training within the mail application (rather than via the web
interface), simpler configuration, a setup wizard, the ability to (easily)
filter/rescore mail already in the client, and the plug-in takes care of
moving messages for you.
I can't think of any reason that you'd want to use sb_imapfilter instead of
You could use sb_server if you wanted to be able to do training remotely
(via the web interface). The only other reason I can think of is that the
plug-in just didn't work on your system - sb_server has a simpler job to do,
and so is likely to. However, it'd still be better to report the problem
and use the plug-in when it's fixed. sb_server does get slightly 'cleaner'
mail than the plug-in (Outlook mucks about with it before the plug-in gets a
chance), but I don't believe that anyone's found that to actually have any
Can anyone think of any others?
(Note that none of this should be taken as criticism of sb_server or
sb_imapfilter or the web interface - I believe they do a good job; the
advantages all come of the tight integration with the mail client).
Please always include the list (spambayes at python.org) in your replies
(reply-all), and please don't send me personal mail about SpamBayes. This
way, you get everyone's help, and avoid a lack of replies when I'm busy.
More information about the Spambayes