[Spambayes] Site server revisited...

[Tony Meyer]

> It seems to me that adding the train capability to 
> xmlrpcserver.py would be the way to go, security issues taken 
> care of. Comments ?

Feel free to do this, and please consider submitting a patch (via the
sourceforge system <http://sf.net/projects/spambayes> if you do so.

You're correct in noting that the db backend is not really designed for
concurrent access, although I suspect that the sql-based backends would
probably handle this ok (the implementation is only really there as an
example, though, and I'm not sure anyone uses it).  In any case, putting
training into xmlrpcserver.py would make sense, to me at least.

=Tony Meyer

---
Please always include the list (spambayes at python.org) in your replies
(reply-all), and please don't send me personal mail about SpamBayes. This
way, you get everyone's help, and avoid a lack of replies when I'm busy.