[Spambayes] Tony Meyer - Training question
bill.hely at helyholdings.com
Sun Sep 18 11:59:15 CEST 2005
Thanks Tony. Much appreciated.
- Bill H.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: spambayes-bounces at python.org
> [mailto:spambayes-bounces at python.org] On Behalf Of Tony Meyer
> Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2005 6:37 PM
> To: sales at technology.cc
> Cc: spambayes at python.org
> Subject: Re: [Spambayes] Tony Meyer - Training question
> > At this time I would like to know if you have changed your
> > opinion on training since then. Here's what you said in a
> > to me on August 10, 2004 after reading my draft chapter.
> Yes, I would stick to what I said then. I would perhaps add
> after time it is probably worth adjusting the thresholds, so
> that not
> quite as much ends up in the unsure folder, but maybe that's
> > I basically distilled your advice down to "do no pre-training
> > all - train only on the UNSURE folder".
> *And* any mistakes.
> > Where do you stand on training these days, for people who
> > will not or cannot follow a complicated set of instructions.
> It still seems that 'fpfnunsure' (all mistakes and unsures)
> generally good results with SpamBayes, and it's certainly the
> method to use with the Outlook plug-in. I would (and do) still
> recommend it.
We take security very seriously. All outgoing mail is
certified Virus Free. To boost YOUR security visit
The Hacker's Nightmare: http://HackersNightmare.com.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.1/104 - Release Date:
More information about the Spambayes