[Spambayes] Q: pop3proxy: configuration: pop3 sessions

Ralf Römling web_use_1 at roemling.org
Fri Aug 4 19:43:12 CEST 2006


Thanks for your reply, but I've wanted the proxy because I want my users to
get rid of their spam without involving them into the technical process.
Therefore, the plugin is no option and I'm going to use spamassassin
instead...


Message: 2
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 08:45:27 -0400
From: "Coe, Bob" <rcoe at CambridgeMA.GOV>
Subject: Re: [Spambayes] Q: pop3proxy: configuration: pop3 sessions
	arecounted but no mails
To: <spambayes at Python.org>
Message-ID: <42393C9DA7930245AB540667607F4F5006FD33F6 at SPIKE.city>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="iso-8859-1"

> From: spambayes-bounces at python.org 
> [mailto:spambayes-bounces at python.org] On Behalf Of Tony Meyer
> Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 10:32 PM
> To: Ralf R?mling
> Cc: spambayes at python.org
> Subject: Re: [Spambayes] Q: pop3proxy: configuration: pop3 
> sessions arecounted but no mails
> 
> >> Why are you using the POP3 proxy with Outlook?  The Outlook plug-is
> >> *much* simpler to install and use.
> >
> > umm, thought I mentioned that earlier... I'm trying to run it in 
> > conjunciton with my exchange-server2k whose recipients connect via 
> > POP3- connectors to the mailprovider.

That's not a reason not to use the Outlook plugin on any client computer
that has Outlook. Outlook will let you set up an "account" that picks up its
mail from a POP3 server, and that mail gets filtered just as it would if it
came in via the usual Exchange protocol. I do that all the time on my home
network.

I wouldn't try to talk you out of using the proxy if that's what you prefer.
But I sure wouldn't use the proxy in a situation where I could use the
plugin.

Bob



More information about the SpamBayes mailing list