[Spambayes] SpamBayes feedback
Scott
scotthaggard at cox.net
Fri Oct 20 21:21:02 CEST 2006
Hi Skip,
Thanks for your quick response. I would have to say it's in the neighborhood
of 500-600 hams that I've had it train on. It has 90/15 for thresholds. I
never changed the thresholds, nor have I played around with those numbers. I
just didn't know know enough to have any idea what to change them to. Do you
recommend some other settings? I would definitely be willing to change those
for better results, however, as of late I have been seeing improvement.
-scott
> -----Original Message-----
> From: skip at pobox.com [mailto:skip at pobox.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 8:08 AM
> To: Scott
> Cc: spambayes at python.org
> Subject: Re: [Spambayes] SpamBayes feedback
>
>
> Scott> [-] I found that SpamBayes to be much less
> accurate "out of the
> Scott> box" than other free anti-spam products I've
> tested. It's my
> Scott> opinion that SpamBayes took much longer to train
> than I expected
> Scott> in order to reach a level of usefulness. I have
> fed SpamBayes
> Scott> well over 1000 spam messages.
>
> How many hams have you trained on? What sort of settings do
> you have for the thresholds? Out-of-the-box the spam and ham
> thresholds are pretty conservative.
>
> Skip
>
More information about the SpamBayes
mailing list