[Spambayes] Spambayes trashes PST file links in OuchLook
rcoe at CambridgeMA.GOV
Mon Jun 11 22:48:38 CEST 2007
I was unaware of this discussion until now, but I've seen the problem
Chuck describes or one very similar to it. I think, in fact, that it
happened to me on two different occasions. And when it did, it took a
lonnnnng time to get cured. Unfortunately, I've forgotten how I finally
cured it or whether it just went away finally. I did split one large
.pst file in two in the hope of preventing a recurrence. In any event,
it hasn't happened lately (i.e., for at least a year and maybe two).
At the time, I didn't think my problem was related to Spambayes, but
conceivably it was. If I remember more about it (or, God forbid, it
happens to me again), I'll post a message.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: spambayes-bounces at python.org
> [mailto:spambayes-bounces at python.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Cole
> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 11:09 PM
> To: Tim Peters
> Cc: spambayes at python.org
> Subject: Re: [Spambayes] Spambayes trashes PST file links in OuchLook
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tim Peters [mailto:tim.peters at gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 9:16 PM
> > To: cncole at earthlink.net
> > Cc: spambayes at python.org
> > Subject: Re: [Spambayes] Spambayes trashes PST file links
> in OuchLook
> > [Mark Hammond]
> > > ...
> > > See above - once you can demonstrate the problem is indeed
> > > deterministic and caused by spambayes, I'll be happy to
> look at ways
> > > to prevent spambayes doing it.
> > Chuck, if this isn't clear, the developers don't know what you're
> > talking about ;-),
> That's quite clear :-)
> I have defined the problem adequately to leave it as a bug
> report, and I have found a remedy for the effects I've had.
> As noted in my last email to Mark, I am through discussing
> this and wholly uninterested in debugging Spambayes myself.
> but would be happy to pursue this if you could
> > supply a recipe with sufficient detail so that they could
> provoke "the
> > problem" /themselves/.
> That was never clear at all.
> I already gave enough exact definition for those familiar
> with the specific desktop things to reproduce or examine the
> fault to any degree it is reproducible elsewhere (I'm using
> OutLook 2000 and WinXP). They work with those tools by
> choice and may know how to spot loopholes for errors.
> I only dropped in to report an bug and look for a solution.
> That's done now.
> SpamBayes at python.org
> Check the FAQ before asking: http://spambayes.sf.net/faq.html
More information about the SpamBayes