[stdlib-sig] Proposal: new "interpreter" module
musiccomposition at gmail.com
Mon Apr 7 22:36:56 CEST 2008
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Christian Heimes <christian at cheimes.de>
> Antoine Pitrou schrieb:
> > Le lundi 07 avril 2008 à 17:09 +0200, M.-A. Lemburg a écrit :
> >> Introducing a new long name "interpreter" doesn't really help
> >> with resolving the problems you state in the rational and neither
> >> does putting APIs from both groups into that new module :-)
> > FWIW, I agree with the naming suggestion. "import cpython" makes things
> > explicit.
> Yeah, +1 for the name. Explicit is better than implicit.
Ok! reposting relevant portions:
A new builtin module named "interpreter" (see `Naming`_) will be added.
The second list of items above will be split into the stdlib as follows:
The interpreter module
- _getframe and _current_frame
The gc module:
The author proposes the name "interpreter" for the new module. "pyvm"
has also been suggested [#pyvm-name]_. The name "cpython" was also
well liked [#cpython-name]_.
> stdlib-sig mailing list
> stdlib-sig at python.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the stdlib-sig