[stdlib-sig] Any feedback on proposed http and xmlrpc packages?

[Alexandre Vassalotti]

On Feb 4, 2008 12:06 AM, Bill Janssen <janssen at parc.com> wrote:
> Maybe a subpackage, "http.xmlrpc".
>

Yuck. That is just unnecessary duplication of information. XML-RPC, by
definition, uses HTTP as the transport mechanism. So, I see no point
in adding yet another level of packaging. Remember, the subpackages
are meant to make the module names shorter, not longer.

-- Alexandre