[stdlib-sig] tkinter package idea

Brett Cannon brett at python.org
Wed Feb 20 21:16:23 CET 2008


On Feb 20, 2008 5:14 AM, Ron Adam <rrr at ronadam.com> wrote:
>
>
> M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> > On 2008-02-20 11:05, Brett Cannon wrote:
> >> While I would rather have a tk package (heck, I would be fine with
> >> ditching Tkinter entirely, but I really don't see that happening), but
> >> the Tkinter name is so wide-spread I don't think that is reasonable.
> >
> > Hey, it's Py3k...
>
> + 1
>

Is that for the removal or the package name of tk? Question applies to
MAL as well as I forgot to ask that of him when he made the Py3K
comment.

>
> >> So here is my current thinking:
> >>
> >> Tkinter -> tkinter.__init__
>
> Possibly
>
>     Tkinter -> tk.tkinter
>
> and have tk.__init__ import it with "from tk.tkinter import *"?

I would rather do tk.inter than that amount of repetition in the
package/module name.

-Brett


More information about the stdlib-sig mailing list