[stdlib-sig] tk package added to PEP 3108
Fred Drake
fdrake at acm.org
Sun Feb 24 23:39:46 CET 2008
On Feb 24, 2008, at 4:58 PM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> I think that essential things like the email package should
> be part of the standard library.
>
> Non-essential things like e.g. the tk package or the audio/image/etc.
> libs can well be separated out into stand-alone packages.
What's essential is a judgement call. You & I would draw the line in
different places.
Things that are tightly coupled with the Python runtime do seem to
belong in the standard library. A feature that I hear requests for
frequently that would be tightly coupled would be deferred imports.
> They may still be supported and maintained by the PSF, but
> getting them would require an extra install step.
I think supported & maintained by the PSF is fine; I'm not in favor of
throwing out useful packages.
> In any case, I agree that putting energy into such an effort is
> better spent elsewhere.
Interestingly, I didn't see either myself or Brett say anything like
this. I only said I don't have the time to champion such an idea, not
that I had anything else to do (there's work, there's family, and
then... I'm wiped out).
-Fred
--
Fred Drake <fdrake at acm.org>
More information about the stdlib-sig
mailing list