[stdlib-sig] new package idea: socket

[Brett Cannon]

On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Fred Drake <fdrake at acm.org> wrote:
> On Mar 9, 2008, at 7:25 PM, Leonardo Santagada wrote:
>  > I think this would be better:
>  >
>  > socket -> socket.socket
>
>
>  With this modification, +1 on this proposal.

Problem with that is it goes against name simplification;
'socket.socket' is not as simple as 'socket'. So why do the two of you
think this is better than just importing 'socket'?

-Brett