[stdlib-sig] gestalt, too?

Leonardo Santagada santagada at gmail.com
Tue May 13 13:03:19 CEST 2008


On 13/05/2008, at 07:30, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> Either way, I'm -1 on removing the gestalt API, since it's needed
> by platform.py and there doesn't appear to be an alternative for  
> getting
> at certain config information on Mac OS (but don't really care whether
> it's implemented as C module or using ctypes ;-).


What happened to the idea of making it a ctypes module? I'm very much  
in favor to all non performance critical parts of python be in a more  
portable and easier to maintain code.

--
Leonardo Santagada








More information about the stdlib-sig mailing list