[stdlib-sig] Changing the 2.6 renames to not break pickle
solipsis at pitrou.net
Mon May 19 22:30:52 CEST 2008
Le lundi 19 mai 2008 à 13:20 -0700, Brett Cannon a écrit :
> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:
> > Le lundi 19 mai 2008 à 12:21 -0700, Brett Cannon a écrit :
> >> I think that gets __module__ set to the old module name even when code
> >> is imported with the new name. It should also allow the Py3K warnings
> >> to stick around without causing issues when importing from the new
> >> name or suppressing other Py3K warnings. What do people think?
> > Are 2.x pickles supposed to be re-usable under py3k?
> No. This is only so that 2.5 pickles work with 2.6.
Ok. But still, it means that help(new_module_name) will display the old
module name in the help contents?
More information about the stdlib-sig