[stdlib-sig] Changing the 2.6 renames to not break pickle

M.-A. Lemburg mal at egenix.com
Tue May 20 11:51:06 CEST 2008


On 2008-05-20 05:40, Brett Cannon wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Raymond Hettinger <python at rcn.com> wrote:
>> It has been said many times that the goal is not have the exact same code
>> run
>> under both 2.6 and 3.0.  I'm not sure how this is notion is rearing its head
>> again.
>>
> 
> You know what, we will just do it your way without the new names in
> 2.6 because my stress level just can't take being bothered with adding
> new stubs. We will just revert the patches that applied the new names
> in 2.6 and be done with it.

Sorry, Brett for the wasted time and thank you for reverting the
changes.

I'm sure that a lot of Python 2.6 users will make this happy
(even if most will probably never know).

-- 
Marc-Andre Lemburg
eGenix.com

Professional Python Services directly from the Source  (#1, May 20 2008)
 >>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ...        http://www.egenix.com/
 >>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ...             http://zope.egenix.com/
 >>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ...        http://python.egenix.com/
________________________________________________________________________

:::: Try mxODBC.Zope.DA for Windows,Linux,Solaris,MacOSX for free ! ::::


    eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH  Pastor-Loeh-Str.48
     D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg
            Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611


More information about the stdlib-sig mailing list