[stdlib-sig] Changing the 2.6 renames to not break pickle
M.-A. Lemburg
mal at egenix.com
Tue May 20 11:51:06 CEST 2008
On 2008-05-20 05:40, Brett Cannon wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Raymond Hettinger <python at rcn.com> wrote:
>> It has been said many times that the goal is not have the exact same code
>> run
>> under both 2.6 and 3.0. I'm not sure how this is notion is rearing its head
>> again.
>>
>
> You know what, we will just do it your way without the new names in
> 2.6 because my stress level just can't take being bothered with adding
> new stubs. We will just revert the patches that applied the new names
> in 2.6 and be done with it.
Sorry, Brett for the wasted time and thank you for reverting the
changes.
I'm sure that a lot of Python 2.6 users will make this happy
(even if most will probably never know).
--
Marc-Andre Lemburg
eGenix.com
Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, May 20 2008)
>>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/
>>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/
>>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/
________________________________________________________________________
:::: Try mxODBC.Zope.DA for Windows,Linux,Solaris,MacOSX for free ! ::::
eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH Pastor-Loeh-Str.48
D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg
Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611
More information about the stdlib-sig
mailing list