[stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)

[ssteinerX@gmail.com]

On Nov 9, 2009, at 1:02 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> At Google we use a hacked-up version of pylint which seems infinitely
> flexible in the checks you can specify. I assume that the public
> version of pylint is just as capable -- someone just needs to write a
> rule for it.

Is that "hacked-up" version publicly available, or could it be?

Thanks,

S