[stdlib-sig] should we try to add argparse?
Michael Foord
michael at voidspace.org.uk
Thu Sep 10 23:27:38 CEST 2009
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> 2009/9/10 Michael Foord <michael at voidspace.org.uk>:
>
>> Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>>
>>>> Upfront people need to realize that we might have three argument
>>>> parsing libraries for a while, but it won't be forever. If we get
>>>> argparse accepted we would slowly deprecate at least optparse, if not
>>>> getopt (lat time I tried to ditch getopt for Python 3 some argued that
>>>> getopt supported stuff optparse didn't),
>>>>
>>>>
>>> +0 on deprecating getopt, -1 on deprecating optparse. Breaking a
>>> perfectly functional and useful module is stupid.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> So we're stuck with inferior technology?
>>
>
> No, that's never been the case. Download and install argparse.
>
>
>
>
I was talking about in the standard library.
Michael
--
http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/blog
More information about the stdlib-sig
mailing list