[stdlib-sig] should we try to add argparse?

Barry Warsaw barry at python.org
Thu Sep 10 23:30:43 CEST 2009


On Sep 10, 2009, at 5:14 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:

> +0 on deprecating getopt, -1 on deprecating optparse. Breaking a
> perfectly functional and useful module is stupid.

Why does deprecation == breaking?

If you want to continue using optparse, that'll be fine for what?  
18-36 months or so?  It's a trivial amount of work to port from  
optparse to argparse.  We have a process for deprecating modules, so  
let's follow that and migrate to the much better library.

-Barry

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/stdlib-sig/attachments/20090910/eabd3911/attachment.pgp>


More information about the stdlib-sig mailing list