[stdlib-sig] should we try to add argparse?
Barry Warsaw
barry at python.org
Thu Sep 10 23:30:43 CEST 2009
On Sep 10, 2009, at 5:14 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> +0 on deprecating getopt, -1 on deprecating optparse. Breaking a
> perfectly functional and useful module is stupid.
Why does deprecation == breaking?
If you want to continue using optparse, that'll be fine for what?
18-36 months or so? It's a trivial amount of work to port from
optparse to argparse. We have a process for deprecating modules, so
let's follow that and migrate to the much better library.
-Barry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/stdlib-sig/attachments/20090910/eabd3911/attachment.pgp>
More information about the stdlib-sig
mailing list