[stdlib-sig] Breaking out the stdlib

Antoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Tue Sep 15 18:38:31 CEST 2009


Le mardi 15 septembre 2009 à 12:21 -0400, Jesse Noller a écrit :
> 
> Can we please not treat "dead/complete" modules as if they have no
> maintenance burden, or drag down the code base? The reason I avoided
> that terminology in the first place is that there is no such thing as
> code with zero cost.

Let's say "low maintenance", then. "Low" not necessarily meaning zero,
of course.

Regards

Antoine.




More information about the stdlib-sig mailing list