[stdlib-sig] Breaking out the stdlib
Georg Brandl
g.brandl at gmx.net
Tue Sep 15 23:49:43 CEST 2009
Michael Foord schrieb:
> Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>> Le mardi 15 septembre 2009 à 17:14 -0400, R. David Murray a écrit :
>>
>>> Actually I believe I heard from someone other than Laura that required
>>> options were explicitly rejected.
>>>
>>
>> This is one of the reasons why I'm against exclusive module ownership.
>> If a reasonable number of people think a feature would benefit the
>> community, the module owner shouldn't be able to veto it on ideological
>> (or whatever other personal) grounds.
>>
>>
>
> I dislike exclusive module ownership too. We end up in situations where
> modules (like ElementTree) are 'owned' by someone who is absent and
> no-one else is able to (or dares to) touch the code.
Well, one part of module ownership would be to complain about and/or
revert unwanted changes. Which one obviously cannot do when absent
or inactive :)
Georg
--
Thus spake the Lord: Thou shalt indent with four spaces. No more, no less.
Four shall be the number of spaces thou shalt indent, and the number of thy
indenting shall be four. Eight shalt thou not indent, nor either indent thou
two, excepting that thou then proceed to four. Tabs are right out.
More information about the stdlib-sig
mailing list