From random832 at fastmail.com  Thu Mar 24 22:33:42 2016
From: random832 at fastmail.com (Random832)
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 22:33:42 -0400
Subject: [stdlib-sig] Can imaplib be improved?
Message-ID: <1458873222.2158998.559175002.3C7CEAF4@webmail.messagingengine.com>

I assume that everyone who has ever used imaplib is familiar with how
painful its output format is to deal with. I am wondering if anyone else
has any ideas on ways it can be extended in a backward-compatible way to
provide options for better parsing, handling unilateral data from the
server, processing data as it comes in, etc.