[Tracker-discuss] Feature/Change request handling procedure
brett at python.org
Fri Dec 1 00:22:56 CET 2006
On 11/30/06, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
> Stefan Seefeld schrieb:
> > OK, then what about
> > new -> open -> needs_patch_review -> needs_feedback -> closed
> That should work. For bugs, something similar should exist:
> how about "confirmed"?
That would be good since bugs need to be verified as one that can be
reproduced. I guess that would be a parallel, but mutually exclusive, step
to needs_path_review? Or should we name it something like needs_patch to be
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tracker-discuss