[Tracker-discuss] schema ideas

[Stefan Seefeld]

Erik Forsberg wrote:
> "Brett Cannon" <brett at python.org> writes:
> 
>>> For this dicussion I am going to need to pull in some python-dev folk to
>>> help figure out exactly where we want to go with all of this.  I was holding
>>> off on this until we were at the point to discuss this.  But if you guys
>>> want to start this discussion let me know and I will start to get people
>>> over here to help contribute to the python-dev perspective since we are not
>>> going to mirror SF.
> 
> Before we do this, perhaps we should establish some procedure to
> handle all suggestions, to make sure we don't miss anything, and also
> to make sure the suggestions favoured by most people get implemented.
> 
> I have a feeling that the python-dev people already have a procedure
> for this? Our meta tracker should of course be part of it some way. 

Right. Well, my suggestion contained two items:
the use of an 'online' schema to illustrate / document the tracker,
and some actual schema changes. Can I assume that people generally
agree with such a navigation help ? Having that available with the
first version of the tracker may help everybody in the discussion of
subsequent schema / lifecycle changes.

Thus, I suggest I just do the first, and we start discussing the second
once the tracker is life, and everybody who has something to say has
an account on the metatracker, so we can have the discussion there.

OK ?

Thanks,
		Stefan

-- 

      ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...