[Tracker-discuss] schema ideas

[Stefan Seefeld]

Anthony Baxter wrote:
> Speaking for myself - we use priorities to mark "stuff which needs 
> to be looked at before release X.Y" and the like. This could, and 
> should, be better implemented using keywords.

What's the advantage of using keywords for this instead of a more
structured approach where the bug either has a property of type
'target version', or where there is another entity 'release' or 'milestone'
that refers to all bugs to be closed ?
The latter has the advantage of being more expressive, so you could
form more complex queries more easily (either online, or when
generating reports, etc.).

Regards,
		Stefan

-- 

      ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...