[Tracker-discuss] Feature/Change request handling procedure

[Paul Dubois]

I'm basically ok with this as a procedure for the long run.

On 11/15/06, Erik Forsberg <forsberg at efod.se> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Erik Forsberg <forsberg at efod.se> writes:
>
> > http://www.python.org/dev/process/ tells me that there is an "informal
> > voting process" that is sometimes followed on python-dev. Perhaps we
> > could use some variant on this. Here's a proposed way to handle
> > feature/change requests:
>
> >
> > 1) Feature/change requests must be added to the meta tracker. The
> >    priority should be set to 'wish'.
> >
> >    (We might want to setup a detector that sends this list a mail
> >    whenever there's a new issue, and when there's a comment added)
> >
> > 2) Once it's in the meta tracker, let's discuss it, by making comments
> >    in the tracker. If someone has really good arguments on why a
> >    specific issue should be implemented before going live, here's the
> >    chance to publish them in a structured manner.
> >
> > 3) After a short period of discussion, let members of python-dev vote
> >    using the protocol outlined in
> >    http://www.python.org/dev/process/. This can also be done by adding
> >    comments to the tracker.
> >
> > 4) Issues that get many +1 and few -1 can be moved up to priority
> >    "bug", which means "must be implemented before christmas, ehm.. I
> >    mean before going live"
> >
> >    Issues that get a few +1, few -1 and mostly +/-0 can be moved up to
> >    priority "feature" which means "good idea, but let's wait and do it
> >    later".
> >
> > Does this sound like a good or bad idea? Other ideas on how to handle
> > this problem? Is it a problem at all, or should I just cut that blue
> > hair? :)
>
> Any comments from the rest of the tracker team? Michael? Stefan? Paul?
>
> \EF
> - --
> Erik Forsberg                 http://efod.se
> GPG/PGP Key: 1024D/0BAC89D9
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
>
> iD8DBQFFXAHFrJurFAusidkRAgexAJ97CPUVqO62f60cNOU/3qNva17knwCgn1kI
> yW1yFzu2XgrgngLuOfj+dUs=
> =59U4
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> Tracker-discuss mailing list
> Tracker-discuss at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/tracker-discuss/attachments/20061115/051f9c33/attachment.html