[Tracker-discuss] Feature/Change request handling procedure

"Martin v. Löwis" martin at v.loewis.de
Thu Nov 30 23:46:07 CET 2006

Neal Norwitz schrieb:
>> I'm slightly uncomfortable about that approach since it
>> codifies a process which isn't codified so far. The
>> discomfort is only about the codification - I can see
>> that the implied process could actually work.
> But don't we mostly do that already?

That's true. Still, we currently have a flag "is patch"
(by having the issue in the patches tracker), so it would
be a deviation from the status quo not to have that anymore.

I know these fine points are not important for the initial
setup, as they can be changed afterwards. So coding a work-flow
into the tracker is fine with me, I guess.


More information about the Tracker-discuss mailing list