[Tracker-discuss] Ready for Prime Time?
"Martin v. Löwis"
martin at v.loewis.de
Mon Jan 29 21:25:24 CET 2007
Erik Forsberg schrieb:
> * Do we need a public beta period to allow people not on this list to
> test the tracker?
> In my opinion, we should avoid this as I'm afraid it will to lots of
> issues that are seen as showstoppers by people. Better handle these
> problems as they come - after all, this tracker is supposed to be
> much better than the current tracker, so we should start using it
I think there should be a beta period. I understand you want to see
this done, but I still think people should be given a chance to object.
They don't to be given too much time (e.g. two weeks), and issues
can be dismissed as non-showstoppers easily. However, if real
showstoppers are detected, I'd like to know before.
As for showstoppers: it seems that the machine is down at
the moment (Jan 29, 20:07 GMT), no?
> * What kind of documentation needs to be written? And who volunteers
> to do it? :-)
The following pages refer to SF currently:
[this is the 2.5 documentation; SF is referenced in every version
of the manual, both online and installed]
[link to SF search page]
[link to bug manager, patch manager]
[--- many more PEPs ---]
More information about the Tracker-discuss