[Tracker-discuss] Ready for Prime Time?

Paul Dubois pfdubois at gmail.com
Tue Jan 30 01:06:48 CET 2007

It is completely our choice who can change the keywords associated with an
issue. Similar to nosy lists, it is probably best not to be restrictive,
allowing anyone who can post an update (ie, in our case a logged-in user) to
do so.

There was a discussion on this topic that I think came to a conclusion
although I don't know what it was; I thought it was that we would create
appropriate keyword(s).

This should NOT be a showstopper in that whatever the scheme it should not
take me much time to modify the weekly reporter appropriately, once I know
the scheme. If in a worst case I missed a week or two the sky would not
fall. The basic report works now.

On 1/29/07, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
> On 1/29/07, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
> > Paul Dubois schrieb:
> > > I volunteer to be the person who fixes account problems, emails, etc.
> I
> > > am off 5 days a week so I think I can get it done faster than most of
> > > you. I'm for letting it rip.
> > >
> > > I never got an answer to the question of how the patches would be
> marked
> > > so that I can make that report on the weekly.
> >
> > I think this still is a show-stopper.
> >
> Agreed.
> Should we have a 'patch' keyword?  Don't remember if anyone logged in
> can change the keywords, though, let alone attach a file to an issue.
> -Brett
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/tracker-discuss/attachments/20070129/823ad62c/attachment.htm 

More information about the Tracker-discuss mailing list