[Tracker-discuss] bugs.python.org schema redesign

Tennessee Leeuwenburg tleeuwenburg at gmail.com
Tue Mar 24 23:47:45 CET 2009


On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 8:53 AM, R. David Murray <rdmurray at bitdance.com>wrote:

> On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 at 14:01, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 03:47, R. David Murray <rdmurray at bitdance.com
>> >wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 at 01:05, bcannon at gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> I think there is some value in the 'stages' workflow: that tests come
>>> first, then the patch, then the review.  So I'm not sure I like the idea
>>> of converting those to checkboxes.
>>>
>>
>> Well, having them be checkboxes makes it very obvious what issues still
>> need
>> a test, which need help with docs, etc. It should make it easier for
>> people
>> to search for issues that need just help with the docs if that is how they
>> want to contribute even if the patch is also missing a test because the
>> submitter only fixed the bug.
>>
>
> Ah, now I see where you are coming from on that.
>
>  What do other people think? If others are happy with Stage as it is then
>> we
>> could add the "Needs docs" step along with "Needs backporting" and that
>> should fill in the gaps along with a "Needs Decision" keyword to help grab
>> the attention of core developers when people are stuck and need help with
>> deciding how to do something (should address Tennessee's desires). If
>> people
>> want to stick with the Stage idea I can rework the proposal to be more of
>> just a cleanup of what we currently have.
>>
>
> Tests (as in unit test) and code are pretty much the same skillset,
> as opposed to docs.  What about having 'needs docs' as a keyword
> instead?
>
> "Needs decision" as a keyword works for me.


"Needs decision" or "Needs consensus" would be great for me. It would be
nice to be able to "tick off" that stage, checkbox-style (so ticking it off
== stage completed)

I am definitely in the triage / lower-level developer position. I'm happy to
contribute time and code as I'm available to. I'm planning currently to
start doing a lot of work on strftime and strptime, as there are a lot of
quite tractable, isolated issues with those modules, which have been
outstanding for some time.

Cheers,
-T

Cheers,
-T
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/tracker-discuss/attachments/20090325/21c82848/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Tracker-discuss mailing list