[Tracker-discuss] [issue394] Better integration with Rietveld code review tool

[anatoly techtonik]

anatoly techtonik <techtonik at gmail.com> added the comment:

Rietveld now has an API that allows to query all messages for an issue -
http://code.google.com/p/rietveld/wiki/APIs However, to make a progress on
this bug, we need now two things from Martin.

> Martin, is the process to install Rietveld for documented somewhere?

It seems that it isn't, but it is at least evident that it runs through
gae2django -
http://svn.python.org/view/tracker/instances/python-dev/rietveld/ Basically,
there should not be differences in interacting with Rietveld running on
AppEngine or with gae2django version. But I remember that Roundup
integration was using some hacks to inject patches into Rietveld DB.

I propose to move all python.org specific patches for Rietveld to a
separate branch in official repository (like it currently works for
Chromium). It will be easier to sync and maintain.

> What version of Rietveld is currently deployed on python.org?

----------
title: Better integration with Rietveld code	review tool -> Better integration with Rietveld code review tool

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue394>
_______________________________________________________
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/tracker-discuss/attachments/20111130/77850070/attachment-0001.html>