[Tutor] range() in 2.1
Andrei Kulakov
ak@silmarill.org
Thu, 02 Aug 2001 15:21:26 -0400
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 04:44:29PM +0100, alan.gauld@bt.com wrote:
> A question:
>
> I am still using Python 2.0 but am reviewing an
> article which uses Python 2.1. Throughout the article
> the examples consistently act as if range(10) returns
> the values 1..9 whereas in all the earlier pythons
> it would return 0..9
Prentice, right? I noticed this too and it is, indeed,
very odd. I have no idea how they got this result -
I use 2.1 and it starts with 0, as it should. Note
that later on they sometimes use range(1, num).
>
> Have the authors got it wrong or did range() change
> behaviour in v2.1 - I find that hard to believe!
> OTOH the examples in the article look like a cut n paste
> from a terminal session at the >>> prompt (including
> copyright message etc)
>
> Puzzled.
Me too.
>
> Alan G.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
--
Cymbaline: intelligent learning mp3 player - python, linux, console.
get it at: http://silmarill.org/cymbaline