[Tutor] integers are also objects?
Mon, 3 Dec 2001 10:49:11 -0500
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 01:40:23AM -0800, Danny Yoo wrote:
| On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, Remco Gerlich wrote:
| > On 0, karthik Guru <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
| > > thanks a lot for the information.
| > > since integer are objects, do integers also inherit from some
| > > class?? rather are integers instance of some class?
| > No. They're objects, but not class instances. They're types.
| > This sort of thing is being changed in the very latest Pythons, and I
| > haven't followed the recent development, but as far as I know it's
| > still true. Soon there may be an Integer class that does this, but I
| > don't know the details.
| There are details online about the type/class unification that's part of
| the upcoming 2.2 release:
| The __future__ looks quite exciting (and frightening) indeed. *grin*
I think it looks cool. Some of the new things are neat and I think
will work very naturally.
As far as integers go, in 2.2b2 they are instances of the "int"
class (or is it a metaclass, anyways it's the new-style classes) which
inherits from the "object" class. You can create a subclass of it :
class MyInt( int ) :
# override something here,
# or add something here,
# or both
Due to the potential for backwards-compatibility issues, old style
classes are the default, eg :
class AClass : pass
and new-style classes are used if the class inherits from a new-style
class, eg :
class AnotherClass( object ) : pass
the difference is irrelevant if you don't make use of any of the
advanced features. The difference can be significant if you get into
dynamic attribute access (__getattribute__ and __setattribute__) and
the lookup order for inherited members/methods.
If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just and will forgive us our
sins and purify us from all unrighteousness.
I John 1:9