Sat, 29 Dec 2001 22:22:25 -0500
ok, I bound a hysenbug and a typo.
It seems, SOME header sequences are more reliable than others.
MOST people send out the email in a certain sequence of headers, more or
less, and this seems to work better than the older flavor- but even
then, your milage may vary.
WORSE, I found a missing '+' so instead of msg=msg+ (foo), it was
msg=msg(evaluating true, and tossed away), then
which, having HEADER definition field, was ignored. The field definition
literal ("Subject ") was BEFORE this part, and omitted by the missing
ok, that solved some oddities, and got out names back into the FROM
ON ANOTHER FRONT THE REPLY TO FEATURE IS NOW IN AND WORKING.
That means not only can you have reply-to set to the list, it can be set
to a THIRD PARTY, making a MODERATED list simple.
Set the reply to to the moderator. They forward to list if approved,
trash it if not.
Are we having fun yet?
Kirk Bailey wrote:
> test. first line of body, there should be a single blank line above this one
> in the file, but not in your received copy.
> That blank line serves to seperate headers from body in the message.
> -Kirk D Bailey (C)2001
> Addme! icq #27840081
> Within the sweep of his sword, Each man is an Ubar.
> this is the very last line of the message, not even an extra CRLF
> follows this.
> click [REPLY] to reply to sender
> Click [REPLYALL] to reply to the list and poster
> Click RESET for education on computers
> lastline footer
> List random #3
> Hosted by http://www.howlermonkey.net/ ! Free Email and Lists!
> 36<a target="_blank" href="http://www.netflip.com/DL?v=1&w=2335137&x=468&y=60&t=S&n=1">How would YOU spend $200? At NepFlip EVERYONE get's paid!</a><br>
-Kirk D Bailey (C)2001
Addme! icq #27840081
Within the sweep of his sword, Each man is an Ubar.