[Tutor] Better (free) IDEs than IDLE for Linux ?
Magnus Lycka
magnus@thinkware.se
Sun Dec 15 08:09:01 2002
At 04:00 2002-12-15 -0800, Aztech Guy wrote:
>Which other (free) IDE's / enhanced Py interpreters do you like better the
>standard Python interpreter and IDLE - for Linux ? I am using PythonWin on
>Windows, is good enough for me at present. I just downloaded IPython for
>Linux and will be trying it out soon, will post my impressions. But
>wondered about experience of others. I do know about some of the available
>ones, from the one or two reviews that are there on the Python and other
>sites. But would like to hear opionions of people who have already tried
>out some, before downloading any of them. Both non-GUI enhanced
>interpreters - of which I think IPython is one - and proper GUI IDE's are
>of interest.
I've tested IPython (0.2.14pre46) on Win32 recently, and it
doesn't seem to work as well there as I think it does in
Linux. Color doesn't work, neither does autocompletion etc.
A minimalistic IDE, more intended to non-programmers who want
to use python as an advanced calculator is Jean-Michel Fauth's
psi.
I recently tried Boa Constructor, and if you use wxPython for
GUI building, I think this is something to look closer at. I've
mainly tried the debugging features, and they are impressive.
I've never seen anything work well for debugging wxPython GUI
code in a GUI before. It's not as good as PythonWin for pure
editing in my opinion, and I haven't tried the GUI building
features, but I think this will be a serious contender to the
commercial products such as Wing and wxDesigner in time...
I think Boa works as well with Linux as with Windows.
--
Magnus Lycka, Thinkware AB
Alvans vag 99, SE-907 50 UMEA, SWEDEN
phone: int+46 70 582 80 65, fax: int+46 70 612 80 65
http://www.thinkware.se/ mailto:magnus@thinkware.se