[Tutor] assigning __doc__ strings (manually)
Kent Johnson
kent_johnson at skillsoft.com
Wed Sep 1 17:31:38 CEST 2004
You can assign f.__doc__ after f is defined:
>>> def real_f(x):
... """this is my doc-string"""
... return x**2, x**3
...
>>> def f(x):
... return real_f(x)[0]
...
>>> f.__doc__ = real_f.__doc__
>>> f.__doc__
'this is my doc-string'
Kent
At 04:21 PM 9/1/2004 +0100, Hans Fangohr wrote:
>Greetings,
>
>I am facing the following problem and would like some advise:
>
>I have two functions, say for simplicity, real_f and f:
>
>def real_f(x):
> """this is my doc-string"""
> return x**2, x**3
>
>def f(x):
> return real_f(x)[0]
>
>
>The actual work is done in real_f() and some users might be interested
>in x**3 and x**2. However, most of the users will only care about x**2
>and are happy to use the function f() for this.
>
>(In the actual program I am working on there is of course more work
>involved than just computing x**2 and x**3 ...)
>
>Since the main computation is done in real_f(), I thought I'd create a
>doc-string in real_f() that explains the computation being implemented
>etc (as done above).
>
>The function f() does basically the same as real_f() and should
>provide the same docstring as real_f(). To avoid copying the
>information, I thought I could do this when defining f():
>
>def f(x):
> real_f.__doc__
>
> return real_f(x)[0]
>
>
>which -- I was hoping -- would provide real_f.__doc__ in
>f.__doc__. However, f.__doc__ is None.
>
>Can this be solved? Or am I on the wrong track here? Looking forward
>to hearing from you,
>
>Hans
>
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Tutor maillist - Tutor at python.org
>http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
More information about the Tutor
mailing list