[Tutor] Losing the expressiveness of C's for-statement?/RESENDwith example
brunson at brunson.com
Wed Aug 8 02:31:08 CEST 2007
Stephen McInerney wrote:
> Hi Alan,
[ snipage ]
>> As to your particular case one non while option would be a generateor:
>> def half(n):
>> while int(n) > 0:
>> n = n/2
>> yield n
>> for x in half(300): print x,
> It's ok but it's visually clunky. while-loop wins for clarity. lambda would
> also be too quirky.
> I know the generator is more runtime-efficient.
> It's regrettable we have to choose between the clear and the efficient, in
> this situation.
That statement seems to be founded on the assumption that the C syntax
is clear, which has not been established. It is clear to you because it
is what you're used to seeing. Slap it down in front of a programmer
that has never seen the idiom and see what they make of it.
Any time you change languages you have to accustom yourself to it's
nuances. C is probably one of the hardest languages I ever learned, I
can't remember how many times I read and re-read the K&R chapter on
More information about the Tutor