[Tutor] Replying to the tutor-list
rabidpoobear at gmail.com
Fri Feb 16 05:18:39 CET 2007
Bill Campbell wrote:
> The major reason for not setting Reply-To: thelist is that it makes it
> *SLIGHTLY* more difficult to post something to the list and replys should
> go to the sender. IHMO, one should have to go to a little bit of effort
> before posting a message that may go to thousands of recipients.
> Using the ``mutt'' mailer, this effort is simply pressing ``L'' instead of
> ``r'' when posting to the list and adding the listname to the subscribe
> section of ~/.muttrc, hardly a major inconvenience.
It's not the inconvenience but the fact that it's nonstandard, as far as
every mailing list i've been on except this.
You don't pick people to mail specifically on the mailing list, why
should you reply to specific people, unless you hit a special button?
I didn't get the e-mail from you. You posted the e-mail to the list and
i received it because I'm a member of the list.
The list is the sender. It aggregates posts to me. When I reply it
should put my post in the same thread, one level below and immediately after
the previous person's post, like i expect it to.
It has retrained me to use reply-all, but I still don't like it.
Also you end up CCing copies of your e-mails to everyone.
> INTERNET: bill at Celestial.COM Bill Campbell; Celestial Software, LLC
> URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way
> FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676
> ``We believe...that a mugger will kill you in the half-second it takes to
> draw from the holster, but won't harm you while you dial the police on your
> cell phone, talk to the dispatcher and wait half an hour for officers to
> arrive.'' -- Gun-Control Net-work Credo
> Tutor maillist - Tutor at python.org
More information about the Tutor