[Tutor] Automatic generation of an "all possible combinations" array
Hugh M
hyoogle at gmail.com
Sat Jun 16 04:21:33 CEST 2007
Ah, in the case of looking for all n-digit bit-strings that contain exactly
m-1's, the recursive solution is even nicer. Here's how I think of it:
Base Case(s):
- if you want 0 1's (m==0) then return all 0's.
- if you want all 1's (n==m) then return all 1's.
Otherwise Recursive Case:
- return the set of all (n-1)digit bit-strings that contain exactly m-1's
plus a 0
combined with the set of all (n-1)digit bit-strings that contain exactly
m-1's plus a 1
Here's some code that does just that:
def recursive_bit_list(n,m):
if m==0:
return [n*[0]]
elif n==m:
return [n*[1]]
else:
return map(lambda x: x+[0], recursive_bit_list(n-1,m)) + \
map(lambda x: x+[1], recursive_bit_list(n-1,m-1))
If you want it faster and don't mind building up a large in-memory
dictionary as you compute this, you can try incorporating a "memoizer" so
that you don't repeatedly compute the same answer many times.
e.g.:
memoizer = {}
def recursive_bit_list(n,m):
global memoizer
if memoizer.has_key((n,m)):
return memoizer[(n,m)]
elif m==0:
return [n*[0]]
elif n==m:
return [n*[1]]
else:
answer = map(lambda x: x+[0], recursive_bit_list(n-1,m)) + \
map(lambda x: x+[1], recursive_bit_list(n-1,m-1))
memoizer[(n,m)] = answer
return answer
I didn't do any extensive tests- when n is large both of these are far from
speedy... Maybe there are other ideas?
Good luck!
-Hugh
On 6/15/07, Andy Cheesman <Andy.cheesman at bristol.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> The code works great, Thanks for the speedy response. The only problem
> which I can see is that the code scales very bad with the size of n.
>
> So, as I want a small subsection of the data (i.e lines where there are
> only 4 1s, number in the code below) for a system where n is large(>20).
> The idea is that this would reduce the number of iterations dramatic
> despite the individual loop taking longer to operate.(see example data).
> I've modified the bit_list_maker to allow for this but it has started to
> produce rows which are identical.
> Can anyone make any suggestion/improvements to the code
>
> def bit_list_maker_mod(n, number):
> x = n*number
> solution_set = []
> row_total = number
> for i in range(x):
> this_answer = []
> row = 0
> while i>0:
> this_answer.append(i%2)
> if i%2 == 1:
> row +=1
> i=i/2
> if row == row_total:
> break
> while len(this_answer)<n:
> this_answer.append(0)
> this_answer.reverse()
> solution_set.append(this_answer)
> return solution_set
>
> Hugh M wrote:
> > The 2**n different lists that you are seeking have a direct association
> > to the binary representation of the integers 0 through (2**n)-1.
> >
> > You can use this fact and the "repeated division method" for converting
> > numbers between different bases to generate these lists and form the
> > desired list of lists:
> >
> > def bit_list_maker(n):
> > x = 2**n
> > solution_set = []
> > for i in range(x):
> > this_answer = []
> > while i>0:
> > this_answer.append(i%2)
> > i=i/2
> > while len(this_answer)<n:
> > this_answer.append(0)
> > this_answer.reverse()
> > solution_set.append(this_answer)
> > return solution_set
> > *
> > *
> > Another fun way to do it is to build up the lists recursively. The
> > possibilities for n bits can be built from the possibilities for n-1
> > bits by adding a 1 and a 0 to each possibility (ending up with twice as
> > many elements):
> >
> > def recursive_bit_list(n):
> > if n==1:
> > return [[0],[1]]
> > else:
> > return map(lambda x: x+[0], recursive_bit_list(n-1)) + \
> > map(lambda x: x+[1], recursive_bit_list(n-1))
> >
> > Hope this helps!
> >
> > -Hugh
> >
> >
> > On 6/14/07, *Andy Cheesman* <Andy.cheesman at bristol.ac.uk
> > <mailto: Andy.cheesman at bristol.ac.uk>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi people
> >
> > I am trying to generate an array of all possible combinations of 1,
> and
> > zeros (see example data) for a rather nice Kinetic mote Carlo
> program
> > which I am writing python. So far, I've been working out for
> > combinations for 4 or less species by hand as it is quick! but I am
> > looking to automate the process so I can compute combinations for
> large
> > numbers of possible species.
> > I could automate the generation of the array by the use of multiple
> > loops but that doesn't seem rather pythonic. I was wondering if
> anyone
> > had any sensible suggestions or pointers for efficient mechanisms
> for
> > the array.
> >
> > Many Thanks
> > Andy
> >
> > Example Data
> > 3 species
> > array([[1, 1, 1],
> > [1, 1, 0],
> > [1, 0, 1],
> > [0, 1, 1],
> > [1, 0, 0],
> > [0, 1, 0],
> > [0, 0, 1],
> > [0, 0, 0]])
> > 4 species
> > array([[1, 1, 1, 1],
> > [0, 1, 1, 1],
> > [1, 0, 1, 1],
> > [1, 1, 0, 1],
> > [1, 1, 1, 0],
> > [1, 1, 0, 0],
> > [1, 0, 1, 0],
> > [1, 0, 0, 1],
> > [0, 1, 1, 0],
> > [0, 1, 0, 1],
> > [0, 0, 1, 1],
> > [1, 0, 0, 0],
> > [0, 1, 0, 0],
> > [0, 0, 1, 0],
> > [0, 0, 0, 1],
> > [0, 0, 0, 0]])
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tutor maillist - Tutor at python.org <mailto:Tutor at python.org >
> > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Tutor maillist - Tutor at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
>
--
Hugh Morgenbesser hugh at alum.mit.edu 617 504 0734
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/tutor/attachments/20070615/26db01b2/attachment.htm
More information about the Tutor
mailing list