[Tutor] Another assert() question
deaddy at gmx.de
Sun Jul 13 21:41:58 CEST 2008
because set(list) creates an unsorted collection without duplicate entrys
of the items in the list.
If you pass an empty list, the resulting set will also be an empty
A list containing an empty list evaluates non false, since it's not empty.
Maybe it helps you to compare them with the len-command.
len(set()) returns 0, len([]) returns 1.
> At 11:44 AM 7/13/2008, Steve Willoughby wrote:
> Dick Moores wrote:
> Yes! A rule, not logic. I'm not contradicting Kent, just helping myself
> understand. First the rule, then logic in the application of the rule.
> And I
> assume the rule is there in Python because it makes things work better.
> Yes, so a statement like "if foo:" becomes an idiom for "if the
> collection foo
> has stuff in it:" which is handy whether foo is a text string or a list
> Yes, I've been using that, a bit uneasily.
> One question about the data I listed. Why is bool(set()) false,
> whereas bool([])
> is true?
More information about the Tutor