[Tutor] problems with numdifftools
nicolaiheitz at gmx.de
Tue Oct 26 20:59:40 CEST 2010
First of all thanks for your response. I am also new to this forum so I
expected to receive an email if somebody replies to my question. Therefore I
just read it today....
> I am not sure if you are the right persons to contact but if not I
> would appreciate a short notice and maybe an address where I can find
I'd try the numpy mailing list:
Alright. I will try that.
> 5) In principal Python can divide those numbers (2.3e-28)/(5.6e-6)**3
I get half the result you suggest above:
which agrees with my HP-48GX, and the result after simplifying by hand
to 2.3e-10/175.616. So I think that is the correct result, not 2.6e-12.
You are totally right. I forgot to write down a factor of 2. I am so sorry
> My source code is attached. Please keep in mind that I just started
> programing and Python is my first Language. I tried to do my best to
> comment every single step to make the code readable. Here it comes:
Comments are good, but too many comments hurt readability. Don't feel
that you need to comment every single line. Comments like:
x = x+1 # increment x by 1
are just noise. But this is a good comment:
x = x+1 # add correction for wind-chill factor.
> self.m = 39.96*1.66*10**(-27) #m is the mass
> of a single trapped ion in the chain
I wonder why you calculate m with an explicit exponentiation operator,
instead of a floating point exponent?
The difference is very small, so it probably doesn't matter:
Haha, you are right. Thats just because I am a physicist and used to write
it down that way. I changed that!
> for i in range(len(x)):
> for j in range(len(x)):
> if j >i:
> Vx = Vx + C * (abs(x[i]-x[j]))**(-1) #then we
> add the coulomb interaction
You can simplify that nested loop and addition:
for i in range(len(x)):
for j in range(i+1, len(x)):
Vx += C * (abs(x[i]-x[j]))**(-1) # add the coulomb interaction
The function range takes up to three integer arguments:
range(start, end, step)
where start and step are optional, defaulting to 0 and 1 respectively.
By starting the inner loop at i+1, you guarantee that j is always > i
and therefore you can skip the test.
The other change is that instead of
Vx = Vx + something
you can write:
Vx += something
Thanks. I got it. In the beginning it is just hard to see every
simplification. But I understand what you were suggesting and I corrected
it. Sometimes a program evolves also physically. So I added the while loop
because I found out later that I need it.
Tutor maillist - Tutor at python.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/-Tutor--problems-with-numdifftools-tp30034615p30060567.html
Sent from the Python - tutor mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the Tutor