[Tutor] Fwd: Re: The Perennial 3.2 vs 2.7
mlybrand at gmail.com
Sat Nov 19 20:03:36 CET 2011
Whoops. Hit reply only again. Sorry terry.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Mark Lybrand" <mlybrand at gmail.com>
Date: Nov 19, 2011 11:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Tutor] The Perennial 3.2 vs 2.7
To: "Terry Carroll" <carroll at tjc.com>
Based on what everyone has said and the fact that my learning material is
for 3, I think I will be okay learning 3 and will stumble into the gotchas
as I develop with 2.7. Luckily my experience as a programmer should keep me
warm at night :)
PS. I shall resist the temptation to force python to use curly braces and
will learn to embrace indentation.
On Nov 19, 2011 10:51 AM, "Terry Carroll" <carroll at tjc.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Wayne Werner wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Mark Lybrand <mlybrand at gmail.com> wrote:
>> so, use my 2.7 and not my 3.2 for my study? Or use my 3.2 for
>> study and then do what I have to in 2.7 after including those
>> Honestly it probably doesn't matter. Many 3rd party libraries have now
>> been ported to Python 3.x, so unless you have a particular library you're
>> interested in, I would start with 3.2 until you find something you can't do.
> Personally, that's the biggy for me, and why I remain on 2.7. wxPython
> has not yet been ported to Python 3, and that's a substantial big deal for
> Tutor maillist - Tutor at python.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tutor