[Tutor] How it is better than java
Christian Witts
cwitts at compuscan.co.za
Mon Sep 19 15:53:53 CEST 2011
On 2011/09/19 03:27 PM, Ashish Gaonker wrote:
> My obvious thinking is : Java being compiled language , must be faster
> then a interpreted language.
>
> I know couple of points : Development time is less + easy to learn +
> python is expressive.
>
> Can you share some more especially as compared to Java / .net (two
> primarily used languages in enterprise language & web based applications)
>
> --
> Thanks & Regards
> Ashish Gaonker
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tutor maillist - Tutor at python.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
I would suggest reading `Python is not Java` [1] and `Java is not
Python, either` [2], old but good reads. And then ask what is your
focus for development. Better is extremely subjective and can be liable
to induce flame-wars, although this list is quite friendly.
To me, I started using Python as a glue language, controlling process
flows and the like, with still heavy uses of C and PL/SQL for what I
do. Over time Python has taken center-stage for my projects due to
ease-of-use and rapid application development and only moving time
critical work that "needs" to be faster to C but in most cases that is
not needed for me anymore.
Add to that the great work on PyPy [3] which is extremely efficient, I
hardly ever have to write in another language if I don't wish.
[1] http://dirtsimple.org/2004/12/python-is-not-java.html
[2] http://dirtsimple.org/2004/12/java-is-not-python-either.html
[3] http://pypy.org/
--
Christian Witts
Python Developer
//
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/tutor/attachments/20110919/739dfb17/attachment.html>
More information about the Tutor
mailing list