I've added two graphs (technically: Dumb Art Graphs) to the article. They prove either: - that I'm wrong, since they show that my scheme is just as complex as one which does have "real" metaclasses. - that I'm right, in sofar that my scheme is equivalent to one which does have "real" metaclasses. Or both. ;-) Still at: http://starship.skyport.net/~just/meta/ Just