[Web-SIG] http content-location header, and different browsers
James Y Knight
foom at fuhm.net
Sat Oct 16 02:37:00 CEST 2004
On Oct 15, 2004, at 7:59 PM, Irmen de Jong wrote:
> Carlos Ribeiro wrote:
> [....about Content-Location header...]
>> I have limited experience with this. But if Firefox guys decided it
>> wasnt worth fixing, they're probably correct. God knows how much email
>> (and bug tickets) they get when something they do works differently
>> from IE or other 'mainstream' browsers.
> It was news for me too. I always thought that Mozilla(/firefox)
> followed the RFCs to the letter. But this was the first one that
> I encountered that they deliberatly chose *not* to implement.
> Because if they did, it would break a lot of sites (apparently)
> and people start to blame Mozilla.
> I wonder what Opera users do with this. Because Opera
> will break those sites...
Actually, Opera also doesn't follow the RFC, as I recall. It only
listens to Content-Location if the host and port matches that of the
real URL. This fixes the problems with IIS servers, which are most of
the broken sites.
More information about the Web-SIG