[Web-SIG] PEP222 and python on the server?
Mike Orr
mso at oz.net
Fri Jun 10 06:46:10 CEST 2005
I may have read the PEP wrong. I thought it said 'wsgi.input' had to be
a file object. But it says it can be a file-like object. I guess a
StringIO would suffice, and that would be serializable.
Rene Dudfield wrote:
>Is not possible to use something like sendfile(2) with wsgi?
>
>Where you need a socket file descriptor to use it.
>
>If not, then you can't send files very efficiently.
>
>
>On 6/10/05, Phillip J. Eby <pje at telecommunity.com> wrote:
>
>
>>At 03:34 PM 6/9/2005 -0700, mso at oz.net wrote:
>>
>>
>>>The only limitation in WSGI I've found is you can't serialize it for IPC
>>>since it contains an open file descriptor.
>>>
>>>
>>That's quite a generalization there. First, many WSGI implementations
>>don't have a file descriptor involved. Second, there are lots of ways to
>>serialize things, including e.g. transmitting file descriptors via
>>Unix-domain sockets. Third, nothing stops you from reading the data and
>>sending *that* via your IPC mechanism. Fourth, you can always do IPC via
>>HTTP. :)
>>
>>But if what you meant was that pickle, marshal, and XML-RPC won't handle
>>some kinds of file-like objects very well, then, yes, and disregard the
>>previous paragraph. :)
>>
>>
>>
>_______________________________________________
>Web-SIG mailing list
>Web-SIG at python.org
>Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
>Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/mso%40oz.net
>
>
More information about the Web-SIG
mailing list